lilliburlero (
lilliburlero
) wrote
in
regshoe
2022-08-04 09:42 pm (UTC)
no subject
Sorry for the spoiler, even if it was fairly minimal - I forget how little we get told in
Master and Commander
! No more, I promise.
I think O'Brian (O'Brien is the more common Irish spelling, so I hesitate; once I found myself flitting between writing about him and Flann O'Brien, a proofreading shitshow) was rather an old fraud, and not in the amusing way. I still don't know if some of the impenetrability of the descriptions of naval manoeuvres and engagements is just me being dense and not very good at spatial visualisation or O'Brian cogging furiously from accounts of Thomas Cochrane's exploits without really knowing what he's talking about. Por qué no los dos, I guess!
(
20 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
I think O'Brian (O'Brien is the more common Irish spelling, so I hesitate; once I found myself flitting between writing about him and Flann O'Brien, a proofreading shitshow) was rather an old fraud, and not in the amusing way. I still don't know if some of the impenetrability of the descriptions of naval manoeuvres and engagements is just me being dense and not very good at spatial visualisation or O'Brian cogging furiously from accounts of Thomas Cochrane's exploits without really knowing what he's talking about. Por qué no los dos, I guess!