Recent reading
May. 26th, 2025 10:05 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The Bee-Man of Orn and Other Fanciful Tales by Frank R. Stockton (1887), which I read a little while ago when one of the stories from it caught my attention in the
once_upon_fic tagset. Although I didn't end up matching on or writing for it, I'm glad I read the collection! The stories are weird and sideways in their priorities in an enjoyable way that I really like in original/modern fairytales—especially 'The Griffin and the Minor Canon', the story that was nominated for
once_upon_fic; many of them, including that one, aren't centred around romances, which was refreshing; and Stockton's writing style is also enjoyable.
Moby-Dick by Herman Melville (1851). Things I had osmosed about this book before reading it: 1) it's about a mad quest for revenge after a whale; 2) it's really gay, 3) it contains a lot of long digressions full of dubiously accurate whale facts and 4) it's completely bonkers. These are all true; osmosis failed to prepare me for just how true. It's an amazing book, well worth reading, and I can't quite sum up what it's like. It's kind of like if Victor Hugo was American and the French Revolution was whales, perhaps. The structure and style are very funny, even besides the passages—they take up too much of the book, both in length and significance, really to call them digressions—in which the narrator Ishmael tells us everything he knows about whales and whaling. While Ishmael's voice is very important throughout, he's not really the POV character of a lot of the narrative sections, which frequently include scenes he's not apparently there for, focus on other characters and explore their thoughts in detail; much of the dialogue consists of theatrical soliloquies, quite a few chapters open with stage directions and occasionally the whole thing actually switches into script format for a chapter. This book is also incidentally the most ethnically-diverse nineteenth-century novel I've ever read.
As for being really gay, the book opens with canon There Was Only One Bed (and I do mean the fanfic trope There Was Only One Bed, not simply bedsharing) between Ishmael and Queequeg the fascinating Pacific Islander harpooneer; a day or two later they're declaring that they are now married and going off happily to sign up on a whaling ship together, whence the rest of the plot. Though there are occasional good moments, Ishmael/Queequeg is rather neglected later on in the book in favour of whale drama and whale information, which was a bit disappointing. On the other hand I very much enjoyed the whale drama and whale information—Melville(/the narrative written by Ishmael) sees the whole world in whales and whaling, and has an amazing talent for making things significant, besides a distinctive, chaotic and frequently hilarious narrative voice.
As for the main plot, however, I was on Moby Dick's side. What a conservation icon.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Moby-Dick by Herman Melville (1851). Things I had osmosed about this book before reading it: 1) it's about a mad quest for revenge after a whale; 2) it's really gay, 3) it contains a lot of long digressions full of dubiously accurate whale facts and 4) it's completely bonkers. These are all true; osmosis failed to prepare me for just how true. It's an amazing book, well worth reading, and I can't quite sum up what it's like. It's kind of like if Victor Hugo was American and the French Revolution was whales, perhaps. The structure and style are very funny, even besides the passages—they take up too much of the book, both in length and significance, really to call them digressions—in which the narrator Ishmael tells us everything he knows about whales and whaling. While Ishmael's voice is very important throughout, he's not really the POV character of a lot of the narrative sections, which frequently include scenes he's not apparently there for, focus on other characters and explore their thoughts in detail; much of the dialogue consists of theatrical soliloquies, quite a few chapters open with stage directions and occasionally the whole thing actually switches into script format for a chapter. This book is also incidentally the most ethnically-diverse nineteenth-century novel I've ever read.
As for being really gay, the book opens with canon There Was Only One Bed (and I do mean the fanfic trope There Was Only One Bed, not simply bedsharing) between Ishmael and Queequeg the fascinating Pacific Islander harpooneer; a day or two later they're declaring that they are now married and going off happily to sign up on a whaling ship together, whence the rest of the plot. Though there are occasional good moments, Ishmael/Queequeg is rather neglected later on in the book in favour of whale drama and whale information, which was a bit disappointing. On the other hand I very much enjoyed the whale drama and whale information—Melville(/the narrative written by Ishmael) sees the whole world in whales and whaling, and has an amazing talent for making things significant, besides a distinctive, chaotic and frequently hilarious narrative voice.
As for the main plot, however, I was on Moby Dick's side. What a conservation icon.
no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 09:20 am (UTC)I really enjoyed the whale parts of Moby Dick -- poetic, surprising, imagistic. Some of the rest of it lost me, but I do love the only-one-bed opening.
no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 09:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 12:41 pm (UTC)What a conservation icon.
SO true.
no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 01:03 pm (UTC)Re the diversity, the New England whaling trade was fully integrated, with lots of Wampanoag and Black whalers at all levels, including captains and owners. It was a vanishingly rare thing in American society at the time. I recently reviewed a book by Skip Finley about it. (I’m on my phone, or I’d link.)
no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 06:04 pm (UTC)I saw that review, I thought it was very interesting! IIRC all Melville's captains and owners are white, but beyond that the book does really give a sense of the whaling ships as a place where people from many cultures, places and walks of life come together and mix.
no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 06:17 pm (UTC)Had a couple of goes at reading it with Whale Weekly (who publishes the sections more-or-less in real-time), and when the pace falls off to an entry a week or so, it becomes very easy for me to never get around to reading them, and wow, now I'm a year out of date and don't remember all the boat crews anymore. What I need to do is just read it on my own, but my tbr stack is of the devil, and worse now that I'm in the alumni Humanities bookclub.
no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 04:53 pm (UTC)This is very interesting even just from a publishing perspective! I wonder how that came to be. What was it like to read and encounter those script sections?
no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 05:18 pm (UTC)٩( ᗒᗨᗕ )۶!!!
I gave up on my first and only attempt to read Moby Dick 17 years ago.
This has just persuaded me of the value of a second attempt.
no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 06:09 pm (UTC)I hope you enjoy it this time!
no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 07:45 pm (UTC)You have convinced me to give Moby Dick a try for the first time!
no subject
Date: May. 27th, 2025 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 26th, 2025 08:21 pm (UTC)I read both the title story and "The Griffin and the Minor Canon" as a child because Maurice Sendak had illustrated picture books of them! It took me until high school to catch up on the famous one of "The Lady, or the Tiger?" which had nowhere near the same effect.
It's kind of like if Victor Hugo was American and the French Revolution was whales, perhaps.
That's a great description.
no subject
Date: May. 27th, 2025 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 28th, 2025 05:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 29th, 2025 03:40 pm (UTC)(I simply cannot view a whale as a metaphor rather than as a living being who does not deserve to deal with Ahab's obsessive projection, lol.)
I think I was less emotionally affected by the whale death than you—I would much rather the whales were left alone, but as it is I can suspend disagreement to appreciate the drama and historical interest of hunting them—but otherwise I agree!
no subject
Date: Jun. 1st, 2025 08:28 pm (UTC)That's it, that's the novel! :D (Well, the "There Was Only One Bed" trope is important too!)
no subject
Date: Jun. 2nd, 2025 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Jun. 4th, 2025 06:27 am (UTC)Quoting from my 2014 review: Miéville is sometimes too grim and squalid for me, but this book wasn't--"swashbuckling" would describe it, rather. Also it reminded me of The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (without the Christian symbolism). Towards the end I wondered how he'd pull it together, but he did so very satisfyingly! I am delighted and charmed.
I haven't read the actual Moby Dick, though.
no subject
Date: Jun. 6th, 2025 09:58 am (UTC)1) No, I've never heard of it; 2) o__O
That description sounds like the sort of thing I might like, though!