regshoe: (Reading 1)
The Man Who Planted Trees by Jean Giono (1953; translated by Barbara Bray, 1995). See, the thing about tree-planting is that I read Oliver Rackham at a formative age and so whenever I hear any encouraging good-news conservation story about big tree-planting efforts I just think 'is this really a good idea?' (the trees planted may not be suitable for the local conditions; planting trees can destroy ecologically valuable non-woodland habitats) and, perhaps more importantly, 'but is it even necessary?' (trees don't need humans to plant them! Anywhere where the local conditions are suited to woodland, as long as it's not overgrazed or too far from established trees to provide a source of seeds, will succeed to woodland on its own if you just leave it alone for a few decades*, and so you should save your active conservation efforts for places that need them, e.g. ecologically valuable non-woodland habitats which will succeed to woodland in a few decades if you don't keep cutting down all the birch saplings). All of which is to say that I was sceptical going into this book. But to his credit, while Giono isn't making any particularly careful effort at realism, he does address ecological issues: the tree-planter finds that some species do well in particular areas and others don't, and has to adapt to local conditions; he starts out as a shepherd, but ends up getting rid of the sheep because they graze the saplings (he becomes a beekeeper instead). More unexpected and more troubling was Giono's consistent and deliberate deceptive presentatation of the story as non-fiction, as described by Richard Mabey in the foreword and Giono's daughter Aline in the afterword of the edition I read. It was apparently widely effective and he regarded it as a good joke. I could get all high-minded and talk about our twenty-first-century knowledge of the harm done by misinformation, but to be honest, I am actually just a 'reader with no sense of humour' as Aline puts it. Still, that rather soured the whole thing.

*This can happen even despite tree-planting efforts: there's an area of my local wood where some people earnestly planted a lot of oak trees twenty or thirty years ago, and now the patch is mostly scrubby birch woodland full of brambles, because that's what does well in early-successional woodland habitat.


The Shortest Way to Hades by Sarah Caudwell (1984). The second Hilary Tamar book has confirmed the series as a fave for me! It's a really enjoyable, well-constructed mystery with clues intricately worked into apparently incidental details; it's just the kind of absurd humour I love, an absurdity of character and incident perfectly confident in its own internal logic and reasonableness; Hilary is a great narrator and detective; have I mentioned how much I love the prose? etc. I don't know whether you could have worked out the solution to the mystery ahead of time: I realised early on that
spoiler the twins not seeing Deirdre fall was an important detail
but didn't trouble to reason any further beyond 'well, maybe they did it then, let's see'. I am definitely shipping Julia/Selena.


The White Cockade: or, Faith and Fortitude by James Grant (1868). A fairly early Jacobite novel, as far as I can tell: on my list only Scott's novels and The Pastor's Fireside are older. And I think it has more affinity with those older books than with later adventure novels like Kidnapped, at least in style—it's fairly long, wide in scope and written with proper mid-Victorian density of prose. It's also rather oddly structured. The first half or so follows our Jacobite hero Henry, Lord Dalquarn as he returns to Scotland in advance of the '45 and has an original adventure plot involving dramatic smuggling, Dalquharn's romance with the lovely Bryde Otterburn, the dastardly schemes of the evil Baillie Balcraftie and a lot of scenic description of East Lothian and the Firth of Forth, while the early part of the '45 happens in the background. But then Prince Charles arrives in Edinburgh and Bryde and Dalquharn join him there, and from that point onwards the book closely follows the historical course of the rising, apart from the odd detour for things like Bryde getting rather tediously abducted by a moustache-twirling Frenchman; the earlier plot is largely forgotten, and what loose ends remain from it are eventually dealt with really rather perfunctorily.

There's a lot of long-winded and not always very relevant historical exposition, and I suppose both this and the plot that follows the '45 so closely (only not the first bit between Eriskay and Edinburgh, for some reason) seemed more interesting and original at a time when few Jacobite novels had yet been published. Several incidents bear amusing similarities to later Jacobite novels, and again, I may have read those other books first but the incidents are more original here! Grant makes a couple of odd historical errors: e.g., he places both John Cameron of Fassiefern and Simon Fraser of Lovat in Edinburgh with the Prince in September 1745, when in reality the former never joined the rising and the latter only did so much later; he also makes, amusingly, the same mistake Edward Prime-Stevenson does in White Cockades of describing Charles's eyes as blue (they were actually brown). His actual view of the Jacobites is more positive than Scott's or Porter's: he balances an acceptance of the moral rightness of their cause according to the ideas of the time, and a lot of admiration for their loyalty and tragic nobility, with a very Victorian Whiggish 'well, the defeat of the Jacobites ultimately led to the present state of affairs, which—God save Queen Victoria and the Empire—is obviously the best possible, so all's well that ends well, right?'. The characters and relationships are not very interesting, apart from a few details that could have gone somewhere good but don't, but the adventure is enjoyable, especially the pre-rising bit. Overall I'd say this is not one of the best Jacobite novels, but it is worth reading—the first half more in its own right, and the second for historical development of views of the Jacobites and the '45.


Also read 'Hornblower and the Big Decision' or 'Hornblower and the Widow McCool', a short story written and set shortly before Lieutenant Hornblower. It's a very interesting story and has given me much to think about vis-a-vis how Hornblower's attitude to an Irish rebel (and deserter) might inform 1750s!Hornblower's attitude to a Scottish Jacobite (and deserter). I was a little bit sceptical of
spoilershow possible it would really be to conceal a mechanism in those carved letters, but charmed by Hornblower carefully inspecting the mechanism and experimenting to figure out how it works
alongside agonising over his moral quandary.
regshoe: Captain Hoseason and Two-Legged Barry from NTS Kidnapped, pointing and grinning at someone out of frame (Hoseason and Barry)
I re-read Lieutenant Hornblower last week (having read it out of order, I've now got back to it in my publication-order Hornblower read-through), and was going to write up something about it but then I re-watched Kidnapped on Saturday and that took up all the room in my brain for a while. Now contemplating an AU where Hornblower and Bush are about fifty years older and somehow end up on the crew of the Precariosa/Covenant.

Anyway:

Some senior lieutenants, on finding themselves having alarmingly tender feelings towards their junior lieutenant, admiring his beautiful sensitive hands and so on, might worry about how that's possibly just a bit gay. Not William Bush! He worries that liking and respecting a man junior to himself in the hierarchy is just not done here in Nelson's Navy and in fact savours of nothing so much as French egalitarianism :O Shocking. I think that's what makes Bush work as a character, really—he's bigoted and conventionally authoritarian in such a cheerful, and sometimes bizarre taking-it-to-the-logical-conclusion, way that it zooms right past repugnant and into absurdly endearing. That, and the contrast in character between him and Hornblower, which comes across especially well in this book with Bush's POV.

Speaking of which: I said in my first review that this book seemed to be more aware of the general horrific messed-up-ness of the navy as a structure and environment and what that does to the characters, and I'm not sure now that that's exactly it. A major theme of this book is the tension between the importance of respecting the hierarchy—senior officers make decisions, come up with plans and give orders, juniors do what they're told—and the fact that sometimes the hierarchy is inappropriate. Captain Sawyer is grossly unfit for command, of course, but there's also Lieutenant Buckland who's merely too weak and indecisive to be a good first-lieutenant-acting-captain, and of course Hornblower himself having a far better tactical brain than the currently-senior Bush, and so Hornblower must delicately and deferentially suggest plans that of course it isn't his place actually to come up with or decide on carrying out. But with the earlier-published, later-set books already existing, this book is committed to concluding that (sometimes at least) things do right themselves in the end, the more competent Hornblower does end up getting deservedly promoted above Bush and Buckland and ends up at the very highest levels of the hierarchy. It doesn't fix him, of course, but that wasn't the point, or was it?

I feel very sorry for Wellard, who does something literally unspeakable as far as the 'must respect the hierarchy' thing goes, and perhaps just a little bit morally dodgy, but really pretty understandable given the situation, and then dies undramatically offstage. He should have got to live and be happy.

Not sure when I'll get round to watching the TV series! I will do it at some point, but I have several other things on my to-watch list at the moment and don't usually spend all that much time watching TV anyway, so we'll see.

Speaking of which: I am faced now with a puzzle, because I know that the TV adaptation is based on Midshipman, Lieutenant and Hornblower and the Hotspur, and was naturally under the impression that those were the first three books in chronological order and followed each other in publication order; but I now have Lieutenant in an omnibus edition of books about 'THE YOUNG HORNBLOWER' which also contains Midshipman and Hornblower and the Atropos but not Hornblower and the Hotspur, so perhaps Atropos is actually the next book? So I've just looked this up: Atropos IS the next book and Hotspur was actually published even later, after Admiral Hornblower in the West Indies which I had been under the impression was the last-published book in the series!! I suppose it's set between Lieutenant and Atropos and that's where the TV order comes from. My goodness, this series is a headache.


...So in this book, right, the war (supposedly) ends and Hornblower and Bush find themselves unemployed when the navy is reduced to peacetime strength; there's a brief discussion of how impossible it is for them to find situations on a merchant ship instead. Well, there was also a war that (actually) ended in 1748, just three years before Kidnapped is set, so what if AU-fifty-years-older!Hornblower and Bush end up in the same situation—but they do somehow manage to get places on a merchant ship... and that merchant ship is the Covenant!
regshoe: Captain Hoseason and Two-Legged Barry from NTS Kidnapped, pointing and grinning at someone out of frame (Hoseason and Barry)
At long last I've made it to the start! Mr Midshipman Hornblower (1950), sixth of the Hornblower books by publication order, is the first chronologically, and thus the point where it's generally recommended one should start the series. I don't regret reading in publication order instead, but I'm beginning to see why this is so.

I got this book from the library in a TV tie-in omnibus edition of the three 'prequel' Hornblower books titled The Young Hornblower (subtitles/blurbs 'A MAJOR NEW ITV SERIES, HORNBLOWER' and 'THE YOUNG HORNBLOWER—A TRULY FORMIDABLE FORCE IN HIS MAJESTY'S SERVICE'). The Young Hornblower as portrayed in the TV series is on the cover, looking dashing and handsome as he wields a cutlass while climbing up the side of a ship. This may or may not be the character in the book.

They took me bonny laddie, the best of all the crew )

So now I have to decide whether to re-read Lieutenant Hornblower (which I've already read out of order) before going on to the next book, Hornblower and the 'Hotspur'. I'm inclining towards yes, because I remember it being a really good one and I'd like to get it in context. So I'll be seeing The Young Hornblower again before very long, I hope. :D
regshoe: Black and white picture of a man reading a large book (Reading 2)
Lord Hornblower by C. S. Forester (1946). The grim conclusion to the original run of Hornblower novels (one more book is set later, but, contrary to my confused mis-osmosis, it's not next in publication order and is in fact very different from this one in tone and style; the rest are all prequels). The early part of the book, in which Hornblower is sent to quash a mutiny off the French coast, has some of the sort of ingenious tactical puzzle-solving that I like about these books, but it's undermined by being about, well, quashing a very understandable mutiny; Forester tries to give Hornblower a sympathetic attitude to mutiny but it comes across as rather trying to eat his cake and have it, especially since Hornblower ends up acting very badly in a way that really wasn't unavoidable. And Bush isn't even there! But then:
spoilersBush reappears, only to be rather summarily killed off offstage in a way I am a little bit indignant about. Then the war ends (for now), Hornblower goes about feeling terrible while the peace negotiations, sending Napoleon to Elba etc. are going on, then he cheats on his wife again in a particularly awful and ridiculous way...
In the final part of the book, Hornblower ends up leading a doomed guerrilla campaign against Napoleon during the Hundred Days, which while a bit grim was dramatically enjoyable: Hornblower and his tiny army are trying desperately to evade their much stronger foe, when we get a significant statement that it's the eighteenth of June... and I was on the edge of my seat for (literally) the rest of the book wondering whether the news would reach them in time. (This book is therefore the opposite of The Wounded Name: the battle of Waterloo happens offstage and it's vitally important.) Besides all that, it's very obvious that this book, taking place at the end of the Napoleonic Wars, was written towards the end of the Second World War; it doesn't really help things, and the descriptions of Hornblower felt a lot more Twentieth-Century Manly in their attitudes than similar descriptions in earlier books. Some good bits, then, but on the whole definitely not the high point of the series. But now, on to the prequels: more Bush! better writing! I look forward to it.

Travels with a Donkey in the Cévennes by Robert Louis Stevenson (1879). Besides the NTS Kidnapped relevance, this is a lovely book. Stevenson continues to be a good travel writer, amusingly observant and self-deprecating, and this book also contains a lot of interesting cultural and historical background. As a Protestant-raised agnostic travelling through a majority-Protestant area of an otherwise Catholic country, Stevenson finds that the topic of religion comes up a lot: at one point he stays at a Trappist monastery where the other guests earnestly try to convert him; in another episode he meets a Plymouth Brother (?apparently a thing in France) who mistakenly thinks he is one too. His travels take him through the country of the Camisards, and he says a lot about them, drawing parallels with the Scottish Covenanters. He also mentions the Beast of Gévaudan, an intriguing historical mystery. And the subtextual presence of Fanny in his thoughts throughout is sweet—it's good to read this and know it ended happily.

In other exciting RLS news, I went to a favourite bookshop earlier this week and found a large and beautiful omnibus edition of several of his novels and short stories, which I am very much looking forward to digging into! It excludes his most famous works on the grounds that (paraphrasing) obviously everyone already has a copy of Treasure Island, so it'd be a waste of space; annoyingly, it also doesn't have The Master of Ballantrae, which I was hoping to read next. Never mind, I'll just have to read Prince Otto instead and find TMoB somewhere else...

The Adventures of Caleb Williams; Or, Things as They Are by William Godwin (1794). This book was written as a sort of accompaniment to the author's previous work, a radical political treatise on the ills and injustices of contemporary society, to articulate those principles through fiction. The narrator, Caleb Williams, works as secretary to a rich gentleman, and he discovers a terrible secret: his employer, Mr Falkland, once committed murder! Falkland finds out that Caleb knows his secret and thence persecutes him relentlessly: falsely accusing him of theft so he's sent to jail, having him tracked down when he escapes, blasting his reputation by publishing an account of Caleb's supposed crimes, making sure this comes to the notice of everyone everywhere he might otherwise get a fresh start; and throughout all, the institutions of society support Falkland and make things worse for Caleb. As an indictment of late eighteenth-century society it certainly has power—the sections on the injustice of the justice system, jails and assizes are especially good—but I think it falters in failing to commit to Falkland's character; Godwin doesn't seem quite able to decide whether he's a basically good man driven to do horrible things out of desperation or a total pantomime villain who was only ever faking being decent. Possibly, though, some of this was the result of (self-)censorship: looking the book up on Wikipedia, I find that the ending—which swerves back to the 'Falkland is actually good' side—was changed from Godwin's original manuscript, which is much more to the villain interpretation. The book is written in very overly-verbose late eighteenth-century style, which does not make easy reading; the edition on Gutenberg contains multiple prefaces (including one for a different book?), and Godwin here sets out in punctilious and earnest detail the specifics of his writing process, which was kind of cute and historically interesting.
regshoe: A stack of brightly-coloured old books (Stack of books)
I read The Commodore a few weeks ago, shortly before the Kidnapped play took over my entire fannish brain, hence the delay in writing it up. And to be honest Kidnapped is still taking up much of my brain right now, but I do want to get caught up on these book review posts, so: Hornblower! :D

So we sailed up north to reach the ice, we took full sails )
regshoe: A stack of brightly-coloured old books (Stack of books)
I think the Hornblower books are really getting good now...

Flying Colours (1938) is the third Hornblower novel in publication order and the eighth in chronological order. It picks up after the cliffhanger at the end of A Ship of the Line, in which Hornblower has just lost a battle with the French; he is now a prisoner in Spain, being glum and annoyed about missing out on all the cool naval battles, and the action kicks off when he is told that he and Lieutenant Bush, also a prisoner, are to be taken to Paris, where Napoleon intends to Make an Example of them. Bush is badly wounded, having lost a foot in that battle, but that's no obstacle to the cruelties of the French; and so he and Hornblower set off, escorted by a French officer and accompanied by Brown, one of Hornblower's crew who becomes their servant. Naturally, Hornblower is not thrilled about this whole 'going to Paris to be shot' thing, and events do not go according to the plans of the dastardly French...

Flow, sweet river, flow... )

I've also read three Hornblower short stories set/written around this point in the series, all of them very interesting; and I've begun working my way through the excellent [personal profile] sanguinity's list of fic recs. Altogether I am very much enjoying this series :D
regshoe: A stack of brightly-coloured old books (Stack of books)
My next Hornblower—which is to say the second in publication order and the seventh by internal chronology. Having sampled the later, better Hornblower books, the plan is to read in publication order from now on and see what I find...

We sailed our course away for Spain... )
regshoe: A stack of brightly-coloured old books (Stack of books)
Lieutenant Hornblower (1952) is the seventh Hornblower book in publication order, the second in internal chronology and was [personal profile] sanguinity's recommendation for which one I should read next to get a feel for the better parts of the series. This was a good idea!

I will brave the wars for my country, where the blundering cannon roar )
regshoe: (Reading 1)
Other books read on holiday and since...


The Happy Return/Beat to Quarters by C. S. Forester (1937; different titles when published in different countries). My first attempt at getting into Age of Sail fandoms! I can't say I enjoyed this one hugely, but I have only myself to blame for that, because I had heard from Hornblower fans that reading the books in publication order is a bad idea and then decided to start with the first-published anyway. (I read the Discworld books in publication order when I was twelve and it didn't do me any harm...!) However—this is a very detailed story of sailing, imperial politics and highly questionable personal decisions set in/off the coast of Central America during the Napoleonic wars; Our Hero, Captain Horatio Hornblower, has to navigate commanding his crew, following difficult orders from the Admiralty, negotiating with some very strange local rulers, more than one suitably dramatic sea battle and an encounter with the strong-willed and somewhat improper Lady Barbara Wellesley (a fictional sister of the future Duke of Wellington). Hornblower would very much like to be a human person with feelings, idiosyncrasies and weaknesses, but he is absolutely convinced that this would be the most unpardonably un-captainlike thing he could possibly do, and so he tries his utmost to conceal his entire character beneath a facade of hard, featureless naval perfection. All his crew love him for it; my reaction to the extremes of this was a sort of cringing horror mixed with annoyance. I think the worst/best bit for me was where Hornblower thinks about how he hasn't discussed his orders with his officers, even though he isn't required to keep them a total secret, because he loves talking and gossiping about everything and is terrified of saying too much and spoiling his reputation. I feel sorry for him, but he does make it difficult! There were also some hints of where people get their slash shipping for this fandom from (I gather that the popular pairing is Hornblower and Bush, the first lieutenant with whom he can't possibly discuss his orders), which was entertaining, but not more than a few hints as yet.

[personal profile] sanguinity tells me that the mood of the books and the portrayal of Hornblower as a character shifted considerably over the course of Forester's writing career, and that the later books are much better. I'm planning to try Lieutenant Hornblower, her recommendation from the later books, next, and then if I like it I may go back and read the rest. I'm also going to try the Aubrey-Maturin books, which I gather are better-written and have some natural history in them.

The Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson Burnett (1911). A classic which I somehow managed to miss out on reading as a child—I think I saw a film adaptation of it at some point, but I can't remember the details. Anyway, I think this book is basically the idea of 'oh, go and get some nice fresh air, you'll feel better!' incarnated as a novel, an impressive achievement. Ten-year-old Mary Lennox, having grown up in the stultifying climate of India, loses her parents to cholera in one of the more horrifying opening sequences to a children's book I've read in a while and then finds herself sent to Yorkshire to live with her uncle in a big house next to The Moors. She is moody and unpleasant, but gradually transforms under the influence of Good Yorkshire Fresh Air and, most importantly, the garden of the title. This belonged to her uncle's wife, and he heartbrokenly abandoned it after her death years before; Mary is shown the door to the garden, all overgrown with ivy, and the key, buried in the earth, by a helpful local robin who befriends her, and sets to work restoring the garden alongside Dickon, the young brother of Mary's maidservant and a sort of local slightly-magical-nature-spirit friend to all animals (it's just occurred to me to compare him to Thomas Godbless, which seems like an interesting idea). Her cousin Colin, who has spent his life being hidden away in the house and convinced that he's hopelessly ill and surely won't live to adulthood, also joins in and is restored to perfect health. I thought all the Wholesome Fresh Air stuff was, er, just a little bit OTT—apparently it originated from Hodgson Burnett's Christian Science beliefs, which perhaps explains the sense of religious fervour in it. But I did enjoy the book overall, and especially all the nature descriptions, magical friendly animals and slightly absurd adulation of the general concept of Yorkshire. The attitudes to health in this context were certainly wobbly, however—I thought Hodgson Burnett convincingly argued that Colin's illness in particular was the result of persuasion and expectations rather than an actual physical disability and could plausibly be 'cured' by fresh air etc., but I was left with a certain suspicion that she wouldn't be especially ready to accept the idea that many disabilities are not that. Also, I remember [personal profile] ethelmay commenting on one of my posts about Juliana Horatia Ewing that a lot of the stuff in this book was ripped off from Six to Sixteen, which, yes, it totally was!

(Looking it up now, FHB not only never lived in Yorkshire, she was actually born in Lancashire. Who'd have thought! o_O )

Emily Davis by Miss Read (1971). Read towards the end of my holiday, when I was getting tired and wanted some comfort reading—the next Fairacre book is always a reliable choice for that. This one begins with the death of Emily Davis, one of the older generation of teacher characters, and shows various friends, former pupils and other members of the community reacting to the news and reminiscing about Emily and her influence on their own lives—helping them, guiding them in their choices, reacting to and wisely overlooking various transgressions and generally being a good influence. It's solidly good in the way of Miss Read books—gentle, perceptive and sympathetic. I especially liked the significance which Emily Davis's life as a single woman gets to have—her fiance left her due to his WWI trauma and she never married, living happily in retirement with her lifelong best friend Dolly Clare, and the portrayal of this situation is lovely; regretting what didn't happen, but living a full and happy life nonetheless. I also sympathised especially with one of Emily's former pupils, who's now living in London for work and, thinking about her old teacher, realises how awful the city is (crowded, noisy, unbearable in a heatwave, etc.) and decides to go back home to the country.

The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter by Carson McCullers (1940). I had been meaning to read this one for ages—the library's copy was bizarrely determined to evade me, but it does prove to exist after all—and I'm glad I got round to it now. It's a more or less plotless novel following the lives of various characters in a mill town somewhere in the US South just before the Second World War; the central figure is John Singer, a deaf and mute man who becomes the unlikely friend and confidant of several very different characters variously hurt and unsatisfied by their lives. Basically it's a story about the human longing for connection and meaningful purpose, as the other main characters seek in Singer someone who will understand their troubles: a thirteen-year-old girl from a poor and overcrowded family who cherishes a passion for classical music and dreams of becoming a composer; a doctor striving to improve the lot of his fellow black Americans, who ultimately fails to make the changes he wants even in his own family; a young man who comes to the town as a sort of vagrant and finds work at a carnival while determined to spread the word of his Marxist ideals to the workers of America; the owner of a cafe (incidentally, defined in the same oddly broad way as in The Ballad of the Sad Cafe) which the other characters frequent, who deals with various personal troubles and lonelinesses surrounding the death of his wife. But Singer is not really the friend the others all seek in him—his muteness and the resulting lack of actual communication between them impede real understanding while allowing them to project whatever they need onto him. And Singer too has an ideal friend, another deaf-mute man who is carted off to an asylum at the start of the book; his loss is a source of great pain to Singer throughout, and none of the other characters ever understands or even, I think, actually knows about it, but Singer's relationship with his friend ultimately seems as self-created and unreal as the others' friendships with him. The whole thing is an oddly dislocated book. It's very, very good! McCullers portrays highly varied and complicated situations, emotions and reactions in brilliantly precise detail, and sums up her characters' predicaments with understanding and sympathy; but it is somewhat grim and very pessimistic about the potential for real connection between people, and I think this gloominess was a bit too much for me in the end.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 4567
891011 121314
15161718 1920 21
2223 24252627 28
29 30     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 02:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios