Recent reading
Dec. 1st, 2024 10:00 amHello! It's been a bit of a time with me lately, but I am back here again now. Have some books.
Fräulein Schmidt and Mr Anstruther by Elizabeth von Arnim (1907). After I read Crossriggs and lamented Alex's lack of significant female relationships,
edwardianspinsteraunt suggested the main character of this book, Rose-Marie Schmidt, as a possible girlfriend for her, and so of course I had to read it and see the speculative crossover femslash potential for myself. It's a one-sided epistolary novel, made up entirely of Rose-Marie's letters to her English briefly-fiancé and then friend Mr Anstruther, whom she met while he was lodging with her family in Jena on a year abroad in Germany. This is a fun structure—we learn a lot about Mr Anstruther and what he's saying without ever getting to read his words directly, and in the meantime enjoy Rose-Marie's accounts of her life in Jena as a spinster living with her obscure-book-writing father, her neighbours, her emotional ups and downs, her rather colourful and varied thoughts on life in general. On the whole I found the emotional shape of the book and the central relationship kind of uncomfortable—no, I don't think it was a good idea to stay friends and keep writing to him after they broke up—but Rose-Marie's character and narration are enjoyable, and yes, she certainly would make a good match for Alex, they have a lot in common.
Tyler's Row by Miss Read (1972). The next in the Fairacre series. Not one of the best, I think—the occasionally doubtful period-typical attitudes seemed a bit more in evidence here than they've been before—but still a good comfort read, and it's interesting to see Miss Read and Fairacre advancing further through time: somewhere between the 1950s beginning of the series and where we've got to now is the divide between 'recent history, but history' and 'just the old days', a vague line but a definitely different feeling.
Witchfinders: A Seventeenth-Century English Tragedy by Malcolm Gaskill (2006). I spent a few hours in the library to escape noise at home and decided to take pot luck from the shelves while I was there. This was in a display, I went, 'ooh, seventeenth-century England, I like that' and it looked reasonably sensible/rigorous (on a subject about which a lot has been written and believed which is neither, hence wanting to be a bit careful), so I picked it up. It proved a really interesting read. It follows the big witchfinding campaign in East Anglia in 1645-6 led by Matthew Hopkins (the notorious 'Witchfinder General'—apparently a self-styled and unofficial title) and his associate John Stearne, placing it in the context of the Civil War and all the sense of social disorder, the world turned upside down etc. that was going on at that time, with some various background on the development of beliefs about witchcraft and witch-hunts. Really fascinating stuff. I was especially interested in how opposition to the witchfinders developed—doubt about whether witches existed at all was not particularly important, it seems, but there was a lot of more specific scepticism and criticism of the witchfinders' methods and the adequacy of their evidence, and the financial burden that witch-hunts placed on local governments and taxpayers was apparently a major source of opposition!
In Memoriam by Alice Winn (2023). Also found at the library; I'd been aware of it for a while but thought it would probably not be that much my sort of thing, but finding it now I decided to give it a try. I was right, it's not that much my sort of thing, but I'm glad I read it anyway. Various thoughts:
Fräulein Schmidt and Mr Anstruther by Elizabeth von Arnim (1907). After I read Crossriggs and lamented Alex's lack of significant female relationships,
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Tyler's Row by Miss Read (1972). The next in the Fairacre series. Not one of the best, I think—the occasionally doubtful period-typical attitudes seemed a bit more in evidence here than they've been before—but still a good comfort read, and it's interesting to see Miss Read and Fairacre advancing further through time: somewhere between the 1950s beginning of the series and where we've got to now is the divide between 'recent history, but history' and 'just the old days', a vague line but a definitely different feeling.
Witchfinders: A Seventeenth-Century English Tragedy by Malcolm Gaskill (2006). I spent a few hours in the library to escape noise at home and decided to take pot luck from the shelves while I was there. This was in a display, I went, 'ooh, seventeenth-century England, I like that' and it looked reasonably sensible/rigorous (on a subject about which a lot has been written and believed which is neither, hence wanting to be a bit careful), so I picked it up. It proved a really interesting read. It follows the big witchfinding campaign in East Anglia in 1645-6 led by Matthew Hopkins (the notorious 'Witchfinder General'—apparently a self-styled and unofficial title) and his associate John Stearne, placing it in the context of the Civil War and all the sense of social disorder, the world turned upside down etc. that was going on at that time, with some various background on the development of beliefs about witchcraft and witch-hunts. Really fascinating stuff. I was especially interested in how opposition to the witchfinders developed—doubt about whether witches existed at all was not particularly important, it seems, but there was a lot of more specific scepticism and criticism of the witchfinders' methods and the adequacy of their evidence, and the financial burden that witch-hunts placed on local governments and taxpayers was apparently a major source of opposition!
In Memoriam by Alice Winn (2023). Also found at the library; I'd been aware of it for a while but thought it would probably not be that much my sort of thing, but finding it now I decided to give it a try. I was right, it's not that much my sort of thing, but I'm glad I read it anyway. Various thoughts:
- The historical language: Not as annoyingly choppy and ungrammatical as some modern writing, but definitely modern. Some of the period language and dialogue felt quite convincing, some of it definitely not so, and the narration had a kind of jarring tendency to discuss its themes in exactly the same terms you'd use to talk about them in a blog post.
- The way the central relationship developed was not to my tastes—it usually isn't in this kind of thing, not a great fault—but I also didn't really like or get on with either of the main characters, which was more of a problem.
- The tone was kind of uneven—it's a pretty dark book in general, but with moments of humour and lighter adventure which didn't seem to sit well alongside the rest. And related to this, I suspect the book didn't develop or integrate its influences well enough—i.e. when bringing together lots of different influences into a story you need to do more than just cut bits out and stick them together in a new shape, and I think this book didn't, and hence you end up with weirdly-choppy, tonally-dissonant pieces everywhere. I say I suspect, because I'm not actually that familiar with any of the influences Winn describes in her afterword, but I could look at her accounts of them and see, ah, that's why that part of the book feels so different all of a sudden. (I did recognise some of the humour from 'Blackadder Goes Forth', which is a great show and very good at combining comedy with darkness, but it's not at all doing what this book tries to.)
- I liked the epistolary and in-universe document bits of the book. I thought the opening contrast between two issues of the school magazine—one from June 1914 with light-hearted accounts of school events, poetry and silly chatty editorial comments, then one from October which opens starkly with a list of the school's recent dead and wounded—was great (although it would have worked even better without the newspaper announcing the beginning of the war in between—the reader already knows that, or can infer it), and the Rolls of Honour are used to good effect later on too.
- And I liked some of the side characters and relationships. Gaunt/Sandys was messy in an interesting way, and I really liked Devi (and the whole prisoner-of-war camp section of the book in which he appears, jarringly different in tone as it is from the rest) and Maud, and would have liked to see more of them and their perspectives.