regshoe

"The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing", right? XD I really like the idea of finding a balance between both approaches, instead of just going with one--it makes a lot of sense.

(Arguably more overt homoeroticism than FotH, actually—the narrator actually says at one point that he could never have loved a woman, because he loved his friend first).

Ahhhh, imagine if she had kept that bit in TFOTH!!!! <3 But yes, there are so many similar little details, it's very cool! And I think it's interesting that Broster's style developed into something a bit more subtle-ish?... I mean, this story mentions love a couple of time, and while TFOTH doesn't as explicitely, as a reader I never doubt it... does that make sense?